Operating flight 123 on
the afternoon of August 12, 985 was one of
Japan Air Lines special short-range (SR)
Boeing 747s. Modified to hold up to 550
passengers, the aircraft is structurally
reinforced, and perfect for Japan's high
density domestic flights. The flight came
on the eve of a Japanese holiday where
families traditionally return to their
place of birth and the flight was filled
nearly to capacity, with 509 passengers on
board. Twelve flight attendants and the
three flight crew brought the total to
524. Flight 123 lifted off from Tokyo's
Haneda airport just after 6:00pm bound for
Osaka, some 215 miles away.
Thirteen minutes later,
the aircraft had reached it's cruising
altitude of FL240 and was just off the
coast southeast of Mt. Fuji. Suddenly, the
controller handling 123 saw the aircraft's
transponder code switch to 7700, the
emergency setting. 123 then came on the
radio, saying "Tokyo...JL123. Request
immediate...ah...trouble. Request return
back to Haneda...descend and maintain
FL220." The controller approved the
request and gave 123 a vector back towards
Haneda.
The aircraft, however, seemed to be
wandering and the controller again called
123 and gave it further heading
instructions. Clearly the crew was under
stress, so the controller told 123 that
any further contact should be in Japanese
to ease any further difficulties. The
aircraft had now turned back inland,
northbound towards Mt. Fuji. By this time,
the news had gotten to JAL's headquarters
back in Tokyo and the company called 123
on the company frequency.123 told them
that "Ah...the R5[cabin] door is broken.
Ah...we are descending now." This didn't
really give any indication of the problems
that 123 was having, so the company gave
no further advice.
Meanwhile, the aircraft
was now heading east and was down to
13,500ft. The crew called Tokyo control
again at this point, saying "JL123, JL123
uncontrollable!" The controller told 123
to maintain it's heading of about 090
degrees towards Haneda, but the aircraft
began a left turn, rolling out on a
heading of about 340 and down to 6800ft,
lower than many of the mountains in the
area. As the controllers continued to talk
to 123, the aircraft slowly recovered to
13,000ft. 123 asked for it's position,
which was now some 45 miles northwest of
Haneda. The aircraft then turned right,
again nearly eastward and began a rapid
descent down to 8,400ft when the
aircraft's target disappeared from radar.
123 bounced off a ridge and impacted near
the summit of Mt. Osutaka. Because of the
rainy weather and the darkness, rescue
crews were not able to reach the sight
until the next morning. Incredibly, four
passengers survived
......The obvious question was what
catastrophic event rendered flight 123
uncontrollable. The only clue was in the
transmission "Ah...the R5 door is broken."
Surely though a malfunction of a cabin
door wouldn't cause the difficulties that
123 experienced. Further, examination of
the wreckage showed that the door was in
fact closed and latched properly at the
time of the accident. The aircraft
involved in the accident, JA8119, was not
a new aircraft and had seen a great deal
of work in it's eleven years.
Even so, there had
never been a fatigue-induced structural
failure in the history of the 747.
Terrorism was also a possibility, but two
phone calls from separate terrorist groups
indicated that it was not a likely
explanation. The first and most dramatic
clue came in the form of a photograph
taken by a photographer in a mountain
village. From the photo, it appeared that
the aircraft was missing a large portion
of it's vertical fin and tailcone.
Substantiating this theory, a Japanese
destroyer came across a 15-foot section of
the vertical fin floating in Sagami Bay,
near the same area where the Tokyo
controller first saw the aircraft's
transponder code switch to 7700.
Further search of the
bay turned up several other pieces of the
aircraft's tail assembly. Examination
showed that the pieces had been
substantially damaged before separating
from the aircraft. One of the surviving
passengers was an off duty flight
attendant who was able to provide an
telling account of the accident. She
recalled a sudden decompression in the
cabin starting in the rear of the
aircraft. Ceiling tiles were ripped off
over the rear toilets and the aircraft
began oscillating in both the pitch and
roll axes. She also recalled then engine
power varying widely in response to the
pitch oscillations.
On-site investigation
was hampered by Japanese officials and by
the time investigators were able to reach
the site, critical pieces of wreckage had
been moved by rescue crews. Recovery of
the FDR and CVR showed that shortly after
the decompression, total hydraulic failure
struck the aircraft. With all three flight
control surfaces disabled and the aircraft
unstable due to the stabilizer loss, the
crew only had the engine power to control
the aircraft. Knowing that the aircraft
had lost much of it's vertical fin,
investigators put forth the idea that the
rear pressure bulkhead may have ruptured,
blowing off the tail assembly and severing
the hydraulic lines.
No history of incidents
of this type had been recorded and, though
not by any means new, JA8119 had less than
half of the total hours of the oldest 747.
In fact, the pressure bulkhead had been
factory tested a simulated service life of
20 years, far more than any 747 had flown
and examination of the wreckage showed no
signs of corrosion. Further examination of
the rear bulkhead, however, provided
investigators with a startling explanation
of the accident. An area of the bulkhead
was found to be spliced with a row of
rivets. In looking at the maintenance
records of the aircraft, it was found that
it had suffered a tail strike on takeoff
seven years prior, cracking the rear
bulkhead.
Boeing's repair
protocol for such damage calls for a
doubler plate to be placed over the area
to be spliced and a double row of rivets
put in to hold it. The wreckage showed
that two doubler plates had been used, the
gap between resulting in only a single row
of rivets holding the splice. It was found
that this condition reduced it's
resistance to fatigue some 70%.