History
Navy
At the end of World War I, the
role of naval aviation changed from one of
training and coastal patrol to that of a more
integral part of the fleet, with aircraft capable
of going to sea. This required lightweight, small
aircraft with light, reliable, fuel-efficient
engines. Analysis revealed that when the sizable
0.6-0.7 lb/hp penalty for the cooling system was
taken into account, air-cooled engines were
lighter than liquid-cooled. Further, nearly
one-fifth of engine failures were due to problems
with cooling system plumbing. The Navy established
a set of engine requirements that are classic in
the aircraft field:
(a) low weight per horsepower,
(b) high economy in fuel,
(c) maximum dependability,
(d) maximum durability,
(e) maximum ease in maintenance,
(f) minimum cost, and
(g) easy adaptability to
quantity production. This set of requirements
favoured air-cooled engines, but none available
were satisfactory. The Navy tried unsuccessfully
to interest U.S. engine makers in development of
air-cooled engines. Finally, they awarded an
experimental contract to the Lawrance Aero-Engine
Corporation for the development of a 9-cylinder
radial using cylinders from an earlier Lawrance
3-cylinder radial.
Lawrance
Charles L. Lawrance had
designed racing car engines before WWI, and had
become interested in air-cooled engines. He had
formed The Lawrance Aero-Engine Corporation, and
was producing the only air-cooled engine in the
United States at the end of the war. The Lawrance
firm at that time consisted of a drafting room in
New York City, with all engine components being
purchased from outside vendors. Contracts with the
Army and Navy along with engineering expertise
from all three parties allowed Lawrance to push
the state-of-the- art, eventually contracting on
February 28, 1920 to deliver the Navy five J-1s, a
200 hp 9-cylinder air-cooled radial. Before the
J-1 could pass its 50-hour endurance test, the
Navy, in a rush to spend year-end money,
contracted for 50 engines with the verbal
agreement that production would not begin until
the 50-hour test was successful. This test was
passed in January of 1922 and "quantity"
production began. The Navy, not convinced that the
Lawrance Company was substantial enough to be
their sole supplier of engines, tried to promote
competition from other engine makers. Again,
neither of the big two, Curtiss or Wright, showed
any interest.
Wright
Wilbur and Orville Wright got
into the engine business when they could find none
light enough to suit their 1902 engine
requirements. After being the first to fly with an
engine, they continued to build a series of
unremarkable engines until 1916 when the Wright-
Martin Aircraft Corporation was formed to make
Hispano-Suiza engines under license. Wright-Martin
was dispersed in 1919, and a new corporation,
Wright Aeronautical Corporation (Wright), formed
with Frederick B. Rentschler as President. Wright
continued to build and improve the Hispano- uiza.
Wright also developed the R-1, a 350 hp air-cooled
radial for the Army. Although Wright spent over
five years debugging this engine, Curtiss
submitted the low bid for production, and won the
contract.
Try as it might, the Navy could
not persuade Wright to develop 200 hp class
engines for Naval use. Rear Admiral W. A. Moffett
and Commander E. E. Wilson, head of Naval engine
section, pushed Wright to acquire Lawrance and
produce the J-1. To help Wright with the decision,
the Navy informed Wright that no further orders
for their liquid-cooled Hispano-Suiza engines or
spares would be forthcoming. The stormy merger was
accomplished, and C. L. Lawrance became
vice-president of Wright. Rentschler resigned as
president of Wright effective September 1, 1924.
He had grown tired of arguing with the board of
directors, largely composed of investment bankers
with little stock in the company, no appreciation
of the technical merits of air-cooled engines, and
no resolve to do the research and development
required for air-cooled engines larger than the
Whirlwind. C. L Lawrance became president of
Wright. In July of 1925 when Rentschler formed
Pratt & Whitney Aircraft, George J. Mead, Andy
Willgoos, Charles Marks, and John Borrup left
Wright to join Rentschler, creating a real
technical vacuum at Wright. This was partially
filled in early 1926 by E. T. Jones, the former
head of the powerplant section at the Army’s
McCook Field in Ohio, and by Sam Heron.
Heron
Sam D. Heron had worked at the
Royal Aircraft Factory in England from 1915-1916
with Professor A. H. Gibson on the first
systematic, scientific study of aircooled cylinder
construction. Here, the characteristics of modern
cylinders were developed. Heron came to the United
States in 1921 to work at McCook Field where he
used his considerable knowledge to enhance the
air-cooled cylinder in the U.S. Perhaps his most
valuable contributions were the invention of the
sodium-cooled exhaust valve and contributions to
the use of high-octane aviation gasoline. Heron
assisted Lawrance in the development of the J
series of engines while at McCook Field, and
eventually came to Wright after the departure of
Rentschler and the lead engineers. It is said that
Heron personally inspected all components used in
Lindbergh’s transatlantic engine.
Design and Development
The Wright J-5 traces its
history to the Lawrance J-1, a development project
for the Navy, the first of which was delivered in
May of 1921. Although the J-1 produced the
advertised power, it broke down on the test stand
after a few hours, and did not pass the 50- hour
endurance test for another eight months. The J-1
featured nine cylinders of cast aluminium with
integral cooling fins, cast-in spectacle- shaped
bronze valve seats, and shrunk-in steel liners.
Cylinders were attached to the crankcase via studs
passing through a flange at the base of the
aluminium cylinder muff. This construction was
chosen because it was less costly than machining
cooling fins on the steel cylinder, but was to
prove troublesome in service. The cast-in parts
came loose; the shrunk-in cylinder liner did not
dissipate heat well to the aluminium muff
surrounding it; and the aluminium hold-down flange
often broke. Two valves with an included angle of
17 degrees were used, and the exhaust valve was
mercury-cooled in early engines. Sealing the
mercury-cooled exhaust valves proved so difficult
that this was eventually abandoned.
As we shall see, development of
this engine consisted principally of cylinder
improvements. Induction was via three carburettors
each supplying three cylinders. A single-piece
forged crankshaft necessitated the use of a split
master rod. Two Splitdorf magnetos mounted
crosswise on the front of the engine provided dual
ignition. This magneto location was favoured
because it reduced the crowding of the rear
accessory section. Lawrance experimented with two
larger-bore variants (the J-2), but decided the
displacement of the J-1 was sufficient for its
intended purpose. Lawrance had difficulties with
development and stepping up to the demands of a
50-engine order. Navy Commander E. E Wilson
essentially engineered and forced the merger of
Wright and Lawrance on May 15, 1923 in order to
assure a source for 200 hp class engines for the
Navy. Wright retained the basic J-1 design but
strengthened the crankshaft, connecting rods and
crankcase. The cylinder was improved by bronze
spark plug bushings, harder bronze valve seats,
and increasing the thickness of metal in the
combustion chamber. The three carburettors were
replaced with a single one (eliminating
carburettor synchronization problems), and other
minor changes were made to the lubrication system.
Wright also brought order to Lawrance’s chaotic
manufacturing operation.
This new engine was the Wright
J-3 and appeared in 1923. Further refinements to
the series, based upon field experience, centred
on improving cylinder cooling and durability, as
well as the fuel consumption. The J-4 cylinder
abandoned the troublesome cast-in valve seats
replacing them with seats that were shrunk-in and
rolled into place. The aluminium cylinder
hold-down flange was replaced with one integral to
the steel cylinder barrel that was now screwed
into the aluminium muff. The head and muff still
retained all cooling fins. A new piston design was
instituted. This updated engine, released in 1924,
was called the "Whirlwind".
The J-4A model was in some
respects a step backwards. Attention to weight
reduction resulted in too much metal being removed
from the cylinders. Problems with heat and fuel
consumption resulted. However, this model did
replace the Splitdorf magnetos with better
Scintilla magnetos, instituted a fuel pump drive,
and a single double-barrel carburettor. The J-4B
cylinder had greatly increased fin area, separated
valve ports, and relocated front spark plug. This
improved cooling and substantially improved fuel
consumption and durability. Although the J-4B had
been extremely successful, its fuel consumption
still did not compete with the best liquid-cooled
engines.
The J-5 introduced a completely
new cylinder designed by Sam Heron. This cylinder
featured fins machined on the steel barrel, with
only the upper 1.75 inch screwed and shrunk into
the aluminium head. The valves were placed at a
greater angle to the cylinder axis, inclined at
angles of 35 degrees verses the 8.5 degrees of the
previous cylinders. The valves were of the tulip
type, and were machined from tungsten steel. The
hollow exhaust valve stem was partially filled
with a sodium/potassium salt mixture to assist in
cooling. Each valve was held to its
aluminium-bronze shrunk-in seat by three
concentric helical springs. The combustion chamber
was hemispherical, with spark plugs located at the
front and rear. These cylinder changes provided
much better cooling (particularly of the exhaust
valve) and much better breathing, resulting in
improved fuel consumption.
Rocker arms and push rods were
completely enclosed, a first for any air-cooled
engine made in the U.S. Casting technology still
did not allow the rocker arm chambers to be cast
with the head. Rocker arm lubrication was
accomplished using grease fittings. The Lindbergh
engine had specially built spring-loaded grease
reservoirs that allowed around forty hours of
continuous running without manual greasing of the
fittings.
A new three-barrel carburettor
solved mixture distribution problems that had
plagued earlier models. By 1927, the J-5 had
become the engine of choice for world explorers
such as Chamberlin, Byrd, Maitland, Smith, Goebel,
Jensen, and Brock. It was also widely used in
three- ngine passenger planes built by Fokker and
Ford. Wright went to great lengths to build
quality into the engine at each stage of
production from casting and forging to machining,
final assembly and test. Automated machining was
widely used. Aircraft builders began to see the
aircooled advantage and use the J-5 to replace
liquid-cooled engines. For example, the Travel Air
Company published an increase in capacity from 50
to 60 cubic feet, a payload capacity increase from
700 to 800 lb, and a speed increase from 110 mph
to 120 mph by replacement of the Hispano-Suiza
with a Whirlwind.
Wright continued to refine the
J-5 into the J-6 with an eye toward commonality of
parts and a spread of horsepower ratings. A number
of 9- ylinder R-975 variants were built as well as
5-cylinder R-540s, and a 7-cylinder R-760s. New
type certificates continued to be issued for the
J-6 series through 1937. Wright, never very adept
of thinking up new engine names, called every one
of these "Whirlwinds". As it turned out, betting
on Lawrance and the J-1, and in air-cooled engines
in general, was a good move for the Navy, one that
benefited all of aviation. The J-5 achieved all
the original Navy requirements and exceeded in all
respects the capabilities of competitive
liquid-cooled engines.
Specification
Configuration: 9-cylinder,
air-cooled single row fixed radial
Output: 220 hp @ 2,000 RPM
Weight: 500 lb
Displacement: 788 cu in
Bore x Stroke: 4.5" x 5.5"
Compression Ratio: 5.4:1
Mean Effective Pressure: 123 psi
Specific Weight: 2.27 lb/hp
Specific Output: 0.28 hp/cu in
Cruise Fuel Consumption: 13.2
gal/hr @ 75% power
Cruise Specific Fuel Consumption:
0.45 lb/hp/hr @ 75% power
Cruise Oil Consumption: 0.77
gal/hr @ 75% power
Cruise Specific Oil Consumption:
0.035 lb/hp/hr @ 75% power
6 hr mission specific weight: 0.99
lb/hp/hr (engine + fuel + oil @ 75% power)