Cessna, however, didn't have a design ready to go, where most other manufactures had been cranking out two-place training/recreational aircraft before the war. Cessna had to start from scratch. Although it isn't known how much, or if, they studied the Luscombe, there are too many configuration similarities to think otherwise. It would have to be assumed, they at least took note of that pre-war airplane's size, construction and success and took off from there.

120/140 Model Differences.
Let's start the conversation about Cessna 120/140's off right by passing along the phone and address of the Cessna 120/140 club. They are the people with all the answers.

Cessna 120/140 Club
Dave Lowe-President
Box 830082
Richardson, TX 75083
(502) 736-5392

The littlest Cessnas are not easy to tell apart and, for most of us, it was a proud day when we finally understood the subtle differences between the three basic models of two-place classic Cessnas, the 120, 140 and 140A.

First of all, the 120 and 140 were initially produced concurrently. It's unclear, however, whether the 120 was to be an economy model of the 140 or the 140 was to be the luxury version of the 120. However significant the marketing department thought the differences to be in 1946, the gap has narrowed to zero, since most consider the airplanes to be nearly interchangeable. The 140A, however, signalled a relatively major design improvement.

The visual differences between the two models include items which only the 140 has: the rear quarter windows and long, skinny flaps. We'll discuss the flaps later, but they shouldn't be the deciding factor between buying one model or the other. Then, as if things aren't confusing enough, a lot of 120s have magically sprouted the quarter windows of the 140.

140's received an up-dated instrument panel in 1948 which eliminated the "old-fashion" looking central cluster of instruments. A new floating panel spread the instruments across the cockpit. Radios are usually mounted left of the pilot's control yoke.

Cessna 140A
The "A" model was introduced in 1949, presumably in an attempt to jump-start flagging sales. An estimated 525 were built, including a small number of "Patroller" versions with Plexiglas doors, 42 gallon tanks (!) and a message tube though the floor. The fuselage remained the same, but the wings were completely redesigned for the 140A. The blunt, rounded planform disappeared to be replaced by an even more "modern" appearing semi-tapered shape. When Fowler flaps were later added, these were the wings which would be used on the still-to-come 150s. The C-85 was replaced with a C-90 in the 140A.

140A wings are stressed-skin aluminium, which eliminates the need for the second strut. This is why "A" models have a single, aluminum strut. The ailerons run the entire length of the tapered section and the tips are squared off. The flaps were shortened, but are several inches wider than straight 140 flaps and seem to be a little more effective.

Mechanical Description
If you want to know how a 120/140 is built, look at a C-150/152. Structurally, with the exception of the welded steel struts of the 120/140s, and the fabric covered wings, they are almost identical.

The spring steel landing gear of the 120/140 was the first large-scale application of Steve Wittman's patent and it obviously worked. There have been a few incidents of gears cracking through the rivet holes (many are now bolted) which hold the steel steps in position but a simple Zyglo test will show if there are problems there.

Other than corrosion problems typical of all old aluminium airplanes (along the rear spars or anywhere which can trap gravity-driven condensation), the airplanes have been relatively free of mechanical maladies. The most common problems include cracked elevator hinges and an occasional cracked rear fuselage bulkhead.

The brakes are one area of concern. The originals were Goodyears with floating disks held in alignment with spring clips. They used small, round brake pucks which have gotten terribly expensive and many owners machine down automotive pucks to fit (ssshhhh, the feds might hear). A much bigger worry is the possibility of a brake locking, if a retaining clip is lost and the disk cocks over and gets jammed. Converting to McCauley or Cleveland brakes is the usual fix.

Incidentally, because of the outside storage and general age of the airplanes, their wiring bundles are sometimes frayed and brittle. Check all wiring carefully.

A note about the airplane's mechanical character: This is an airplane that responds beautifully to TLC and elbow grease. Everything about it is easy to take apart for cleaning and painting.

Flying Characteristics
Each classic airplane has its own flying personality and so does the 120-140. It's important to remember it's a post war design. Most of its contemporaries were originally designed before the war to perform on the A-50 or A-65 so they are smaller and lighter. The C-120/140 is a bigger airplane and is a little heavier feeling and flying than something like a Luscombe or a Taylorcraft. It doesn't feel quite as much like a maple seed in the wind, as do some of the others. Make no mistake, however, it is still a very light airplane. Depending on the model, they'll weigh-in empty at 950-1000 pounds and gross at 1,425 pounds (525 pounds useful).

The first thing you'll notice on boarding a 120/140, is that getting in isn't much of a hassle. Although some purists de-cry the use of control wheels rather than sticks, having the floor free of obstacles does ease entry.

Once in, the next thing you notice is that seeing over the nose is possible with only a slight stretch. With a cushion behind them, the average-height pilot can see the centreline without stretching. The cockpit is slightly narrower than the latest C-152, but about the same as its contemporaries. This makes it fine for the FAA-standard 170 pound pair but gets crowded rapidly as crew dimensions increase.

Unless converted to key start, the airplane has a separate pull-to-start handle which, to a pilot used to modern Spam cans, seems unusual. Once the engine is running, the straight exhausts are evident even at idle. On takeoff they really bark. It's hard to believe we all used to fly these without headsets, as a matter of course. No wonder we're all half-deaf.

If the tailwheel is in even remotely good shape, the airplane will taxi nearly as effortlessly as a nosewheel airplane, needing an occasional tap on the brakes to make sharp corners. The excellent visibility makes it that much easier.

Take-off performance is directly related to the amount of weight on board. As with all lightly wing loaded, low-powered airplanes, the two-place Cessnas are different airplanes solo or dual. In no case, however do they float off the ground like a Cub or Luscombe. Actually, they takeoff remarkably like a Cessna 152, although without as much ground roll.

When the tail is raised during takeoff, the spring gear is immediately noticeable because it doesn't have the solid feel of a bungee gear and "wallows" just a little. Here, it feels almost exactly like a Citabria and for the same reason. If the wind is on the nose, the airplane will track almost perfectly straight. It will, however, try to gently turn into a crosswind. A little rudder pressure takes care of that.

If the crosswind is a real howler, the pilot will have to work to keep the wing down because the ailerons don't get effective until there is a fair amount of wind going across them. Somewhere around 25-30 mph, they start coming alive.